DORSET POLICE SPEND RATE PAYERS MONEY
ON A STRING OF MALLISCIOUS CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE VICTIM OF A CAR
In 1996/7 Mr Coulters solicitors finally
served a writ on then Chief Constable Aldous, for facilitating the second
theft and loss of his Jeep. This was over a year later than the initial
theft of the vehicle, when the police claimed that they had no power
to impound the vehicle into safe custody, so that Mr Coulters solicitors
could obtain a civil court order for delivery up of the vehicle, from
the crooked car dealer the police had allowed to keep this stolen vehicle.
In fact Mr Coulter and his lawyers had constantly told the complaints
department, the deputy chief constable, and the chief constable that
they had the power to impound the car under section 19 of PACE. The
deputy chief constable had an LLB in law at the time, an was fully aware
of the power he had to impound this Jeep. For some reason the police
have always blamed the county council solicitor Mike Davis for advising
them not to impound the vehicle, and that they had no power to do so.
Davis was married to the former deputy chief constable Sue Davis, who
had been promoted to Commandant of the Regional Police Training Center.
Davis died of a heart attack after he caused these legal proceedings
that are still on-going.
In fact Coulter and his lawyers spent a year trying to engage in a dialogue
with Dorset Police in order to stop the case from escalating, before
they served the action against Dorset Police. This was done only under
provocation from the deputy chief constable to see the evidence : CLICK
Mr Coulter not being aware of the incestuous nature of the Dorset Authorities,
considered the position he found himself to be largely due to the county
council, by their solicitor advising the police not to impound the Jeep,
and then defending the chief constable who ignored warnings from Mr
Coulter and his lawyers that the vehicle was at risk, if the Police
did not impound it in to safe custody. As a result, Mr Coulter telephoned
the chief executive of the council Peter Harvey, not knowing that he
too had a conflict of interest in that he was also Clerk to the Police
Authority at the time. Mr Harvey finally provoked Mr Coulter into serving
the legal action against the chief constable. This
is described here.
DORSET POLICE START THEIR FIRST CIVIL
ACTION AGAINST MR COULTER
Instead of allowing Mr Coulters action to be determined by the courts,
that was a gentlemanly claim for negligence in not protecting the vehicle
from further theft, Mrs Shepherd in the County Council Legal Department
applied for an application to the High Court to strike out Mr Coulters
action against the chief constable. At the time the head of the legal
department was Jenkins who has since been promoted to Chief Executive.
Mrs Shepherd put a perjured affidavit before the High Court claiming
that Mr Coulters action was frivolous and vexatious. She then engaged
a barrister at the Rate Payers Expense, who lied in his avocation to
a Master in Chambers, in order to obtain a judgment striking out Mr
Coulters claim, and seeking costs against Mr Coulter. We now show Sheppards
Perjured affidavit, which we are currently working our way through,
to show reams of lies with all the material she put into the court bundle,
when she applied to have Mr Coulters action struck out as vexatious.
Needless to say, Mr Coulter has refused to pay the costs of a judgment
obtained against him by perjury, in order to defraud him of having his
case heard. To see the affidavit, Click
THE SENIOR SOLICITOR IN THE COUNTY COUNCIL LEGAL DEPARTMENT LIED AND TRICKED MR COUTER INTO NOT APPEALING THE STIKE OUT JUDGEMENT.
Olwin Pritchard-Jones of the County Council Legal Department, was advising elected members on the police authority with regard to this case. So too was the head of the Council Legal Department David Jenkins. This shyster later got himself promoted to Chief Executive of the County Council, after the other corrupt shyster Peter Harvey vacated that position to continue being Clerk to the Police Authority, having to keep the lid on and cover up police misconduct.
Pritchard-Jones had a telephone conversation with Mr Coulter where it was agreed that if he did not appeal the strike out proceedings, where he would have presented evidence of Dorset Police Tampering with Evidence in the form of P.A.C.E. recorded interview with the car thief, and shown evidence that he and his lawyers were provoked into taking the actions against the chief constable, then Dorset Police would not pursue him for costs. It was agreed that he would instead pursue the crooked car dealers, who cut up his jeep for parts and then reported it stolen.
Mr Coulter also agreed not to publish the content of the PACE interview with the car thief, something he still has not done to this day, but due to the police and the county council legal department breaking this agreement, and lying to the courts in civil litigation, mr coulter reserves the right to now publish this.
THE NEW CHAIRMAN OF DORSET POLICE AUTHORITY ALONG WITH HIS CRONIES HAVE
STARTED 2x IDENTICAL CIVIL ACTIONS IN AN ATTEMPT TO PUT MR COULTER IN
The first attempt was blocked by Mr Coulters lawyers, and an injunction
obtained against Dorset Police from taking further proceedings, with
Mr Coulter getting costs awarded against the Chief Constable (and the
police authority) that will ultimately be paid by the Dorset Rate Payers.
That is why they issued the second set of proceedings which are now
estoped, pending an appeal into the first bankruptcy action they started
at the rate payers expense. This was heard in June 2004. The dullards
who are the lawyers representing the Police Authority, despite them
lying to the court that it is the chief constable taking these actions,
were sent a letter from Mr Coulters Lawyers dated 11th November 2003,
asking them to show relevant statutory provisions for the present chief
constable to pursue Mr Coulter into bankruptcy. They further were given
a demand to pay the £1700 costs that Mr Coulter won against Dorset
Police when he won the injunction against them. All Mr Coulters Lawyers
got in response was a load of nonsense failing to show the statutory
provisions, and asking a lot of silly questions. To see the evidence
MICHAEL TAYLOR TOOK OVER AS CHAIRMAN FROM PETER JONES WHO IGNORED SOLICITORS
LETTERS MAKING FORMAL CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST OFFICERS.
Taylor would sooner collect his renumeration from the quangos he
serves on, and arrange to attend jollies at the rate payers expense,
whilst at the same time obstructing the course of justice and refusing
to deal with official criminal allegations against police officers.
Furthermore he has the audacity to send a letter to Mr Coulters lawyers,
raising the subject of supposed legal fees that were awarded against
Mr Coulter, after Mrs Shepheard in the County Council Legal Department
put a perjured affidavat, and exhibited evidenced that had been tampered
with. Taylor was warned by the lawyers that he should take this
case to independent mediation in order to save costs to the rate payers.
He was further warned that if he started litigation against Mr Coulter
then it would only cause cross claims and counter-litegation. To see
the evidence of this and the letters sent CLICK
DORSET POLICE AND THEIR CRONIES IN THE COUNTY COUNCIL LEGAL DEPARTMENT,
START MALLICIOUS BANKRUPCY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MR COULTER.
Taylor ignored the lawyers warnings and engaged a firm of bent solicitors
Lester Aldridge & Co of which there are a number
of criminal allegations leveled against them in other sections of this
site, to act on their behalf, at the rate payers expense. Furthermore
the solicitor acting for the police Michael Veal does not have the mental
capacity to understand when Mr Coulter is speaking plain English.
In fact Michael Veal at LESTER ALDRIDGE has been told that this matter
should go to Independent Mediation, as his actions are only going to
cause more actions in the courts as a response. Mr Veal would seem to
be as Arrogant as the Police Officers and members of the Police Authority
who instructed him. Instead of trying to stop matters from escalating
by verbal dialogue, he has insisted in putting the issues detailed above
in writing, however he did not say to write on paper. Therefore it has
been detailed above on the Internet. Mr Veal has written an arrogant
letter stating that he does not understand how the issues raised are
relevant to the SUPPOSED debt owed. We are sure anybody reading the
above can understand what Mr Veal does not have the mental capacity
to take on board. No wonder these people are arrogant, you the Tax Payer
are paying for it! To see a copy of his Arrogant Letter - Click
On 1st August 2003 Mr Coulters solicitors, (who had already
been pre briefed, despite Michael Veals arrogance in telling Mr Coulter
to take legal advice, what makes the dullard think he didnt?),
wrote to Mr Veal. In their letter they set out Chapter and Verse of
what Mr Coulter had already explained to them, when he was attempting
to stop further escalation by verbal dialogue. We do not understand
how Michael Veal and others at Lester Aldridge are
going to understand the solicitors letter. Mr Coulter speaks plain English,
and we are sure you people can understand the above easier than the
technicalities of the solicitors letter. However Michael Veal on his
own admission does not have the mental capability of understanding plain
English in verbal dialogue. We suspect he may have to seek a barristers
opinion (Jobs for the Boys at the Tax Payers Expense) However for every
case, and for every barristers opinion, there is a barrister on the
other side with an opposite opinion. Wouldnt it be easier to just sit
down and talk, and try to find a way to resolve the issues? This would
be in the interest of the Dorset Rate Payers.
In fact Michael Veal and the solicitors in the county council legal department, and the corrupt clerk to the police authority, Peter Harvey, were all qualified lawyers. Therefore they knew that they had to engage in verbal dialoge to try to resolve matters without the need for court action and this is a requirement of the civil courts. In fact it states on the court forms that they would have filled out that the court will want to know what steps have been taken for round table meetings with the parties involved. The court forms also state that the failure to observe this pre-action protocol would result in costs not being awarded to the winner of the case under Civil Procedure Rule 44.
To see a copy of the solicitors
Since Lester Aldridge have insisted on having the issues
put in writing (for everyone to see, instead of without prejudice verbal
dialogue), perhaps they should consider withdrawing from this case all
together. We do not understand how they can maintain a credible position
with an outstanding criminal allegation leveled against them for their
actions in a separate case, where they involved Mr Coulter. Furthermore
there are likely to be civil actions against Lester Aldridge
for playing a dirty hand in that case. At the minimum they have an unacceptable
conflict of interest, and should tell the police to appoint new lawyers
who are not tainted already. If they do not do the honorable gentlemanly
thing, then Mr Coulter will have to make an application to the court
to have them removed.
These Dullards are as Dishonest as the
Police Force they Represent!
They sent a fax to Mr Coulters Solicitors suggesting that they do not
incurred any costs in applying to the court to set aside the action
they and the Chief Constable started, until they contacted the county council / police lawyers
the following day. This would have meant that Mr Coulter and his lawyers
would run out of time to apply to the court to set aside their demand.
If they wanted to look for some other solution other than a contested
court case, they could have saved the money in legal costs on both sides
when Mr Coulter telephoned them with these positive proposals. Unfortunately
Michael Veal claims that he cannot understand this?
We wonder why! In fact the lawyers can see through their misconduct,
did they honestly think that Mr Coulter and his lawyers are that stupid
as to have Lester Aldridge bulling them into an out of time situation,
the lawyers did not respond very favorably to Lester Aldridge. Their
facts proposing this dishonest scenario was dated 06th August and headed
Confidential and for the Addressee Only. However Public Interest now
takes over, as it is in the rate payers interest to know what a bunch
of dishonest incompetent wasters Lester Aldridge are,
especially when they are taking Rate Payers money for doing this. To
See a Copy of their Fax and the Lawyers response Click
On Monday 22 September 2003, Dorset Police Authority and the Chief Constable
had to have a Barrister in court in Hertfordshire over the malicious
bankruptcy proceedings they started against Mr Coulter. This is because
Mr Coulters Lawyer blocked their action and is appealing this in the
High Court in London. However both Lester Aldridge and Dorset Police
are so arrogant and malicious using Rate Payers money, they re-issued
the exact same proceedings against Mr Coulter the following Thursday.
Meaning that they will now have to employ their barrister to go back
to hertfordshire, only for Mr Coulters lawyers to block their action
again, this will all end up in a consolidated case in the High Court
in London at the Dorset Rate Payers expense. MR COULTER HAS
REPORTED THIS TO ELECTED MEMBERS IN DORSET WHO ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM,
BY NOT BECOMMING PART OF THE SOLUTION AND ATTEMPTING TO STOP FURTHER
ESCALLATION AT THE RATE PAYERS EXPENSE.
Following the actions in Hertfordshire where the District Judge was
wrong on a number of issues, the basis of which Mr Coulters lawyers
used as grounds for an appeal. In order to stop the malicious bankruptcy
proceedings, pending a cross claim from Mr Coulter against the Dorset
Authorities, on the 9th October 2003, Mr Coulter obtained an injunction
against Dorset Police, stopping further proceedings pending an appeal
in mid December 2003. When Mr Coulter won the injunction, he also won
costs of over £1,700 (Pounds) against Dorset Police, which will
eventually be paid by increased rates on the Dorset Councils Tax Payers.
Dorset Police were so arrogant, none of those costs were needed, all
they had to do was give an undertaking not to proceed the malicious
bankruptcy proceedings until the appeal is heard in December.
Dorset Police and Leseter Aldridge have got themselves
in a mess over these expensive on going civil actions, that are nothing
to do with stopping crime in Dorset, other than attempting to stop criminal
proceedings against senior officers at Dorset Police HQ. Mr Coulters
lawyers wrote to the dullards at Lester Aldridge, who
cannot show any relevant statutory provision to show that a judgment
cost (obtained by perjury), in the name of Dirk Aldous, can be transferred
to the present Chief Constable, who is not even initiating these proceedings,
but in fact the malicious actions have been authorised by the Chairman
of the Police Authority Michael Taylor, and his Clerk
Peter Harvey, who supposedly advises other elected
members on the legal position. It has been said that Harveys advice
is at the minimum wrong, and at the Maximum Perverse. To see a letter
from Mr Coulters Lawyers detailing this, and asking for the costs Mr
Coulter won against the Police : Click
MR COULTER IS ALLOWED TO BRING CROSS CLAIMS UNDER THE INSOLVENCY
ACT FOR THE COSTS INFLICTED ON HIM, WHEN DORSET POLICE LOST AN AMERICAN
INTERNET TRIBUNUAL CASE. HOWEVER THESE DISHONEST LAWYERS, AND BENT OFFICERS
CONTINUE TO DENY MR COULTER HAVING THE MERITS OF HIS CASE HEARD.
After Mr Coulter obtained his injunction against the chief constables
bankruptcy proceedings the case was sent back to St Albans County Court,
Hertfordshire, on Monday 7th June 2004. In this case a woman, Judge
Field gave a perverse judgment against Mr Coulter, because Dorset Police
applied to her for an ESTOPLE, STOPPING MR COULTER FROM LITEGATING
HIS CROSS CLAIMS.
ARE WE NOW SHOWING THE LIES AND PERJURY OF THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING
THE POLICE AND SUPERINTENDANT GEOFF BRASIER IN THE HERTFORDSHIRE COURT?
Due to the failure of the authorities to deal with Brasier,
following his distorting without
prejudice conversations and perjury in the American Internet Proceedings,
along with Taylor and Peter Harvey covering up his misconduct, Brazier
thinks he has a green light to continue mis-quoting without prejudice
conversations in an attempt to pervert the course of justice in the
Hertfordshire Court. To see a copy of
his affidavat / witness statement, and Mr Coulters one in response,
OLWEN PRITCHARD-JONES HAD
A CONVERSATION WITH MR COULTER BY TELEPHONE, WHEN HE WAS IN JAPAN. RATHER
THAN DENY THAT SHE HAD AGREED NOT TO PERSUE MR COULTER FOR LEGAL COSTS,
PROVIDING MR COULTER DID NOT RE-OPEN LITEGATION AGAINST THE POLICE,
INSTEAD SHE NOW HAS COMPLETE LOSS OF MEMORY. ISN'T THT CONVIENIENT?
However in her witness statement she admits that she was in
charge of a large council legal department with lots of solicitors dealing
with many cases no doubt involving actions enticed by council and police
officers. So many in fact that she cant remember them all, despite briefing
elected members on the early stages of Mr Coulters Case? To
see her witness statement Click Here
Is she now defending and covering up misconduct in her new post at Staffordshire
BEVERLEY JANE SHEPPARD WAS STILL EMPLOYED BY DORSET COUNTY COUNCIL
TO DEFEND BENT POLICE OFFICERS, IS SHE STILL LYING AND COMITTING PERJURY,
OR OBSTRUCTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, AND BEING PAID TO DO THIS BY THE
DORSET RATE PAYERS?
Sheppard claims that there was never an agreement made with
Olwen Pritchard-Jones, either Sheppard is a liar or Mr Coulter is a
Liar. To see her witness statement
WE NOW SHOW THE WITNESS STATEMENT OF MR STUBBERT, THE LAWYER REPRESENTING
MR COULTER, telling the TRUTH about what happened, un like the previous
statemeents of Olwen Pritchard Jones and and Beverly Jane Shepheard.
To see this CLICK HERE.
FOLLOWING THE OUTRAGOUS ESTOPLE BY JUDGE FIELD DISALLOWING MR COULTER
TO HAVE HIS CASE TESTED ON ITS MERITS, AND PRESENTING EVIDENCE OF MISCONDUCT,
WE NOW SHOW THE LAWYERS SKELETON ARGUMENT THAT JUDGE FIELD IGNORED AND
RODE ROUGH SHOD OVER.
To see this CLICK HERE.
Dorset Police dragged MR Coulter's arse back into
Hertfordshire County Court where
judge David Littlejohn (Believed to be a Mason) Refused to
allow Mr Coulter to speak in court, and refused to allow Mr Coulter
to brief his lawyer. Had Mr Coulter been allowed to do this, he would
have said that David Littlejohn was Mr Coulters Lawyer 18 Years earlier
when he worked for Curry Littlejohn + Co. Mr Coulter dismissed Littlejohn, who will never forget being FIRED, due to how colorful the language
was at the time of the unpleasant parting of the ways. Littlejohn rode
rough shod over Mr Coulter, would take no notice of the fact that Dorset
Police had previously agreed not to pursue costs. Further more Littlejohn took no notice of the legitimate cross claim Mr Coulter has against
Dorset Police for his successful defense of the American Internet Tribunal.
Mr Coulter successfully won an appeal of the bankruptcy based
on the judicial misconduct of Judge Littlejohn and his failure to stand
himself down from the case.
Mr Coulter then had another appeal in 2005 setting aside the costs in
the bankruptcy, meaning that Dorset Police must now pick up their own
legal bill! Some £100,000 of Dorset Rate Payers Money, wasted
unnecessarily by these malicious actions.
Mr Coulters Lawyers failed to carry out his instructions and indeed appeared in court when Mr Coulter was not present, only for Dorset Police to want to discontinue their action against Mr Coulter, due to Mr Coulter's cross claim for his costs in the successful defence of the Internet Tribunal in America, being double the amount that Dorset Police were pursuing Mr Coulter for in the bankruptcy proceedings.
Mr Coulter would have automatically been entitled to all his costs in the bankruptcy proceedings under Civil Procedure Rule 44. Due to the failure of his lawyers to pursue those costs and due to the failure of his lawyers to carry out his original instructions to set aside the original strike out application judgement against mr coulter, based on the perjury of Dorset Police, Mr Coulter's Lawyers did not get paid for the mayhem in all these court hearings. It would appear Lester Aldridge would have been paid either by the Dorset Rate Payers or an Insurance Company, who will no doubt put their premiums up to Dorset Police and Dorset County Council over the costs they racked up in these malicious bankruptcy proceedings.
Mr Coulter will continue to make criminal allegations of misconduct in public office and institutionalised misfeasance by all those officers and members of Dorset County Council and Dorset Police Authority. He hopes that one day they will be investigated by a Metropolitan Force not in the West Country Police Region, with a view to Criminal indictment against these officers and members.
CLICK HERE TO GO HOME